Thank you for helping me have converstaion about AI use with my students!

Love this as a way to check for AI as an English teacher. Much for reliable and detailed than other checkers.

I'd give this at least four stars because this helps me find AI cheating much more reliably than stupid AI detectors. But why is the free version, which gives me 150 docs a month to view, telling me I have used it on 150 docs and now I need to upgrade, when legit I have used it on 15 docs at the most this month so far? It's KILLING me. I am a teacher, no, I can't afford to add one more subscription on. I don't need more than 150 docs a month. But it's locking me out anyway. If you could fix that, I'd give at least four stars!

This gives me a good idea of how my students are formulating their thoughts and working out their assignments. It also allows me to see how quickly/efficiently they work and if the assignment is too easy/difficult/time consuming.

This extension is a lifesaver as a Middle School Language Arts teacher. It helps me to see when students are struggling with a writing assignment. And if there happens to be any academic dishonesty, I love that it provides a date and time frame to be able to use other district resources to conclusively determine whether it has occurred without just going on a suspicion. So much time and energy saved to be able to determine students needs and adapt lessons to meet those needs.

New Update has made it unusable, it has been 4 days and I have not heard anything about fixing the bug of it always asking you to "See full history - Sign in with Google"

Revision History is a big help. Being able to watch the work being done in real time is a big deal. It allows me to understand how much my students rely on other sources for ideas, spelling and punctuation, which then allows me to tailor lessons to shore up those weak spots.

I love that I can see what is actually happening in documents with work. I hate using any one aspect of writing to determine if work done by students is their own, or if it is being copied from another source. The replay allows me to see what the writing process is and how to actually guide students in the areas which are causing them enough struggle to look for an outside source.

You beautiful people just helped me prove that I wrote my paper and not AI. Everyone deserves a raise.

I admit I had latched on to a few programs that served me well as an experienced teacher and faculty head, but I gave Revision History a go this week and have found its location top of each assignment, and very easy to use features, and layers (so I can much deeper dive on patterns which concern me) has really helped me to identify who has cut corners, and who has worked ethically and transparently. Easy, fast, a range of very easy to skim and use features, and ways I can screen capture evidence for colleagues, students, parents etc - wonderful! It's not cheap, but we're happy with our trial, and will at least extend it for the staff who are engaging, at least for a little while longer.

This is a lifesaver when correcting long peices of writing. A real gamechanger in the age of AI.

I really love using this to help fight against the inappropriate use of AI in the classroom. However, there are two big issues that I wish they would resolve; 1) I wish that I could easily turn on and off the analysis. It counts against my 150 even if I want to look at a document of my own creation. Therefore, I was forced to pay for the extension very early in the year if I wanted to continue to use it. 2) I also need/want to be able to down load the report and/or the draft play video so that I can share it with administration and parents as evidence of my concerns. Revision History's largest competitor, Draftback, allows for both. I am tempted to instead pay for the deluxe version of DraftBack just to have access to this feature though I prefer Revision History's other features.