massive invasion of privacy and makes everything you do on a document watched and reviewed. if you dont have enough trust in a person to be writing legit, then thats an issue you have to handle yourself

This is more of a question than a review (although this has been an incredibly helpful extension! I teach 11th and 12th grade English). My students have figured out how to pull up AI on another device and just type it in manually on their google doc assignment. It is "obvious" to me when they do this, because of what their typing looks like on the replay, which is very different to someone typing normally as they answers questions and such. However, it cannot be used as "proof" or evidence as it doesn't specifically identify AI use. I am wondering if you keep any data, trends, algorithm information (I don't even know if that is the correct term!), or anything that would indicate a certain type of typing would indicate copying from another source (AI). Or are there other identifiers, such as the number of writing sessions and why some are for less than a minute and generally a lot of these in a row for the kids who are most likely copying from AI. Thanks for any information you may have!

I enjoy this extension, it makes me feel less paranoid of being accused of using AI. My writing often gets flagged and it's been a hassle. To students: I think if you wanted to get around this and use AI more productively, such as to reword a sentence or two, just type it manually from the AI into your paper. It wont flag this things sensors and it keeps you from being a dishonest student. To developer: Have you ever thought of maybe making tick marks or shortcuts to the parts of the replay where the large copy/pastes are? This might help teachers narrow down and look into instances of AI usage while saving students the feeling of being examined.

Great operability- no more checking the history manually!

All of the negative reviews I've read are from students that got caught cheating. This works like Draftback, but gives useful summaries as well. It helps me pinpoint where in the revision history I need to go looking for the specific things students have done. This is super valuable for teachers with the increase in AI use by students.

better than draftback. one of the best extensions

This is a very useful tool for teachers. While all the categories of tools such as Deletions, Large copy/pastes, etc are easy to use and provide insightful information, it will be more helpful to explain what the "Active writing time" means and how it is calculated. Sometimes I see, for example, active writing time is only 12 seconds, but the copy/paste was 6 times and deletion was above 50 times, which causes a confusion because even just completing the 6 times of copy/paste and above 50 times deletion, I doubt if 12 seconds was possible. So how should I understand that?

Excellent tool, useful for all educators.

Quick, easy to use tool for reviewing process, time spent, and progress on a document.

This is more of a question than a review, but I am curious as to how I am able to see edits via Revision History that do not show up in Google version history. Does Revision History have more detailed/granular tracking capabilities than Google Docs version history? Just curious as I determine the validity of the Revision History suggested copy pasted segments.

Game changer. I used to use a plugin called Trackback but this is SOOO much more powerful. Thank you so much for creating this!